Some
members of the Sc published a paper “Guidelines for the description ofrhizobial symbiovars”. In this paper, they discussed the requirements and
guidelines to describe symbiovars, propose a set of rules, provide a list of
all symbiovars published so far, and offer a mechanism to maintain a list in
the future.
Proposed
guidelines for the description and naming of symbiovars
1. Description
1a. Plant
specificity is the essential basis to define a symbiovar. Symbiovars should be
described in relation to the symbiosis phenotypes, not only referring to
nodulation but also to effectiveness by considering nitrogen fixation.
1b. A
symbiovar must have a representative strain, and the genome sequence of that
strain must be publicly available and of sufficient quality. It is recommended
(but not obligatory) that the representative strain be available in an
international culture collection.
1c. It must
be demonstrated that the symbiosis genes are recognizably distinct from those
of all previously described symbiovars in sequence or in the presence/absence
of specific genes.
2. Naming
2a. The
name of a new symbiovar must be distinct from all previously recognised
symbiovar names in all genera.
2b.
Symbiovar names that are adjectival always take the feminine gender.
2c. In
other respects, the names of symbiovars follow the same rules as those of
species epithets.
2d. A
proposal for a new symbiovar must be published in the body (not supplementary
files) of an article in a peer-reviewed journal, and must include all the
information required by these guidelines.
3. Recognition
3a. The
ICSP Subcommittee for Rhizobia and Agrobacteria undertakes to maintain a list
of recognized symbiovars and to appoint persons to manage this.
3b. After
publication, authors should submit the publication to the Secretary of the ICSP
Subcommittee for Rhizobia and Agrobacteria.
3c. New
symbiovars that conform to the guidelines and have priority will be added to
the online list of recognized symbiovars on the Subcommittee website (currently
https://sites.google.com/view/taxonomyagrorhizo/home).
3d. The
priority of names is established by the date of inclusion in the list.
Conclusion
In view of the large number of symbiovars described so far, and the likelihood that the number will increase in the future when more legumes are thoroughly studied, we felt the need to consider some appropriate standards and to clarify the status of the symbiovars already described. We have proposed guidelines for the description and naming of symbiovars and offered to set up and maintain a public list as a service to the rhizobial research community. Our aim is to make it easier to understand and use the symbiovar concept. As with any new venture, we may find we need to make adjustments in the light of experience, and we welcome feedback from users.
A list of all symbiovars (in alphabetical order) proposed to date is given in Table 1 in the published paper.